The Rise of ETF Slop — Key Takeaways
Avoid thematic, buffer, covered call, and single-stock ETFs — all four categories show systematic underperformance after fees, with leveraged single-stock ETFs trailing simple benchmarks by 9–12 percentage points per year.
Key takeaways
ETF structure is now a high-fee active fund delivery mechanism, not an index
ETF structure is now a high-fee active fund delivery mechanism, not an index
- 2025: >1,000 US ETF launches, majority actively managed; average fee for new US ETFs >0.7% vs <0.1% for index ETFs.
- For first time in US history, more ETFs exist than individual stocks, and active ETFs outnumber index ETFs.
Thematic ETFs underperform by 6%/yr avg in 5 years post-launch
Thematic ETFs underperform by 6%/yr avg in 5 years post-launch
- 2021 academic study: stocks in theme rise before ETF launch, then revert as optimism normalizes.
- Morningstar 2025: only ~10% of thematic funds globally outperform at 10-yr horizon; 100% of Canadian thematic funds close or underperform by 15 years.
Leveraged single-stock ETFs underperform frictionless benchmark by 9%+/yr
Leveraged single-stock ETFs underperform frictionless benchmark by 9%+/yr
- Bessenbinder 2025: long-leveraged single-stock ETFs lag benchmark by 0.79%/month; inverse funds lag by 1.01%/month (>12%/yr).
- Financing costs hidden in swap contracts — not in expense ratio — cause 2x ETFs to deliver less than 2x up and more than 2x down.
This Dig holds 2 more insights, 4 flashcards, and 3 quotes — free with your trial.
Unlock this Dig freeStart free with 100 credits · No card, no expiry
In this video
- 1mThe Rise of ETF Slop
- 1mUnderstanding ETF Basics
- 3mThe Dangers of High-Fee ETFs
- 4mThematic ETFs
- 8mBuffer ETFs
- 12mCovered Call ETFs
- 14mSingle Stock ETFs
- 18mSimplicity over Complexity
“You get what you don't pay for.”
— John Bogle
This page is a partial, transformative summary produced by Homestake. All rights to the original content remain with its creator — please support them at the source link above.
